On Apr 27 00:31, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:22:07PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >Does it make sense to define SOL_IPV6 now? Patch attached if so.
> I think it does. I've checked in this patch. I'm sure Corinna will
> revert it if I am wrong.
It's not wrong but unfortunately it won't help either. The only SOL_xxx
option supported by Winsock is SOL_SOCKET. But since we already have
the other SOL_xxx options defined, it's a good idea to have SOL_IPV6
defined as well.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com