Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Mustafa M

Unfournately a bug in binutils  (https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/d520d4956e59bd4759932a4d1742828f88c0dd7a)
Prevents cross compiling Julia. Please include and build version  >= 2.3 binutils to resolve this issue.


Thanks,
Mustafa


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

JonY
On 10/12/2018 06:05 PM, Mustafa M wrote:
>
> Unfournately a bug in binutils  (https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/d520d4956e59bd4759932a4d1742828f88c0dd7a)
> Prevents cross compiling Julia. Please include and build version  >= 2.3 binutils to resolve this issue.
>
>

I will put up a test version of 2.31 soon.



signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

JonY
On 10/14/2018 02:09 AM, JonY wrote:

> On 10/12/2018 06:05 PM, Mustafa M wrote:
>>
>> Unfournately a bug in binutils  (https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/d520d4956e59bd4759932a4d1742828f88c0dd7a)
>> Prevents cross compiling Julia. Please include and build version  >= 2.3 binutils to resolve this issue.
>>
>>
>
> I will put up a test version of 2.31 soon.
>
>
Can you test the recently uploaded 2.31.1?


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Mustafa M
In reply to this post by JonY

I’m still having the same linking bug with Julia, despite testing binutils 2.31.1.


(BTW, for some reason I did not receive any reply email on my outlook) I had to manually reply to your response (not sure why or how to properly fix this issue)


Thanks


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Houder
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:53:31, Mustafa M wrote:
[snip]

> (BTW, for some reason I did not receive any reply email on my outlook) I ha=
> d to manually reply to your response (not sure why or how to properly fix t=
> his issue)

Mustafa,

Have you subscribed yourself to the mailinglist? (probably not).

    https://cygwin.com/lists.html ... see bottom of page.

As Jon Y. ONLY replies to the list, and in case you are not subscribed,
you will not receive a copy of Jon's reply.

Regards,
Henri


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

JonY
On 10/15/2018 07:17 PM, Houder wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:53:31, Mustafa M wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> (BTW, for some reason I did not receive any reply email on my outlook) I ha=
>> d to manually reply to your response (not sure why or how to properly fix t=
>> his issue)
>
> Mustafa,
>
> Have you subscribed yourself to the mailinglist? (probably not).
>
>     https://cygwin.com/lists.html ... see bottom of page.
>
> As Jon Y. ONLY replies to the list, and in case you are not subscribed,
> you will not receive a copy of Jon's reply.
>
I just let Thunderbird "Reply" do it's job, it only had the cygwin
mailing list address, guess I'll need to CC.

Anyway, this would mean the bug lies elsewhere. What is the error you
are seeing while cross compiling Julia?



signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Mustafa M
Hi Jon,

Please see my comment here https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/29488#issuecomment-429956141

Apparently @vtnash seemed to suggest the bug was due to https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/d520d4956e59bd4759932a4d1742828f88c0dd7a
Yet even update do the latest test version of binutils   on Cygwin cross compilation is failing for me.

Thanks,

Mustafa M

From: JonY<mailto:[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 7:44 PM
To: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
Cc: Mustafa M<mailto:[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

On 10/15/2018 07:17 PM, Houder wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:53:31, Mustafa M wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> (BTW, for some reason I did not receive any reply email on my outlook) I ha=
>> d to manually reply to your response (not sure why or how to properly fix t=
>> his issue)
>
> Mustafa,
>
> Have you subscribed yourself to the mailinglist? (probably not).
>
>     https://cygwin.com/lists.html ... see bottom of page.
>
> As Jon Y. ONLY replies to the list, and in case you are not subscribed,
> you will not receive a copy of Jon's reply.
>

I just let Thunderbird "Reply" do it's job, it only had the cygwin
mailing list address, guess I'll need to CC.

Anyway, this would mean the bug lies elsewhere. What is the error you
are seeing while cross compiling Julia?




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Mustafa M
Ok I think the issue has been resolved.  There may be some issue with out of tree builds with Julia, because with the latest binutils update I can now build Julia in tree, but for out of tree configurations.



Mustafa M



________________________________
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> on behalf of Mustafa M <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 7:50:12 PM
To: JonY; [hidden email]
Subject: RE: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Hi Jon,

Please see my comment here https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/29488#issuecomment-429956141

Apparently @vtnash seemed to suggest the bug was due to https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/d520d4956e59bd4759932a4d1742828f88c0dd7a
Yet even update do the latest test version of binutils   on Cygwin cross compilation is failing for me.

Thanks,

Mustafa M

From: JonY<mailto:[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 7:44 PM
To: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
Cc: Mustafa M<mailto:[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

On 10/15/2018 07:17 PM, Houder wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:53:31, Mustafa M wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> (BTW, for some reason I did not receive any reply email on my outlook) I ha=
>> d to manually reply to your response (not sure why or how to properly fix t=
>> his issue)
>
> Mustafa,
>
> Have you subscribed yourself to the mailinglist? (probably not).
>
>     https://cygwin.com/lists.html ... see bottom of page.
>
> As Jon Y. ONLY replies to the list, and in case you are not subscribed,
> you will not receive a copy of Jon's reply.
>

I just let Thunderbird "Reply" do it's job, it only had the cygwin
mailing list address, guess I'll need to CC.

Anyway, this would mean the bug lies elsewhere. What is the error you
are seeing while cross compiling Julia?




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

JonY
On 10/16/2018 09:58 PM, Mustafa M wrote:
> Ok I think the issue has been resolved.  There may be some issue with out of tree builds with Julia, because with the latest binutils update I can now build Julia in tree, but for out of tree configurations.
>
>
>
> Mustafa M
>

Awesome, glad you found a workaround.



signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

Mustafa M
Jon is there anyway we could include an updated version of   mingw64-x86_64-binutils and x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld.
( >= v2.30).

The issue is with the mingw-264 toolchain versions.



Thanks,


Mustafa M

From: JonY<mailto:[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 7:49 PM
To: Mustafa M<mailto:[hidden email]>; [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

On 10/16/2018 09:58 PM, Mustafa M wrote:
> Ok I think the issue has been resolved.  There may be some issue with out of tree builds with Julia, because with the latest binutils update I can now build Julia in tree, but for out of tree configurations.
>
>
>
> Mustafa M
>

Awesome, glad you found a workaround.




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

JonY
On 10/17/2018 03:12 PM, Mustafa M wrote:
> Jon is there anyway we could include an updated version of   mingw64-x86_64-binutils and x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld.
> ( >= v2.30).
>
> The issue is with the mingw-264 toolchain versions.

Sure, I will do a test version of those soon.



signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Please include and build version >= 2.3 binutils

JonY
On 10/17/2018 11:28 PM, JonY wrote:
> On 10/17/2018 03:12 PM, Mustafa M wrote:
>> Jon is there anyway we could include an updated version of   mingw64-x86_64-binutils and x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld.
>> ( >= v2.30).
>>
>> The issue is with the mingw-264 toolchain versions.
>
> Sure, I will do a test version of those soon.
>
>

I have just put up the same test versions as the Cygwin binutils, you
can test them now.


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment