[ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

Ken Brown-6
My cygport files and patch are attached.  The two fonts packages
don't need updating, but their cygport files had to be updated, so I'm
attaching them for future reference.

In the case of ghostscript, the current version is 9.22, but it
doesn't work with preview-latex:

  https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698680

So I propose to start with 9.21 until that issue is resolved.

Package files
=============

D=http://sanibeltranquility.com/cygwin
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.21-1-src.tar.xz
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-debuginfo/ghostscript-debuginfo-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-debuginfo/ghostscript-debuginfo-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/libgs-devel/libgs-devel-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86/release/ghostscript/libgs-devel/libgs-devel-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.21-1-src.tar.xz
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-debuginfo/ghostscript-debuginfo-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/ghostscript-debuginfo/ghostscript-debuginfo-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.21-1.tar.xz
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs-devel/libgs-devel-9.21-1.hint
${D}/x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs-devel/libgs-devel-9.21-1.tar.xz

Ken


ghostscript.cygport (4K) Download Attachment
ghostscript-unixlpr.patch (802 bytes) Download Attachment
ghostscript-fonts-std.cygport (820 bytes) Download Attachment
ghostscript-fonts-other.cygport (754 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

marco atzeri-4
On 30/10/2017 19:43, Ken Brown wrote:

> My cygport files and patch are attached.  The two fonts packages
> don't need updating, but their cygport files had to be updated, so I'm
> attaching them for future reference.
>
> In the case of ghostscript, the current version is 9.22, but it
> doesn't work with preview-latex:
>
>   https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698680
>
> So I propose to start with 9.21 until that issue is resolved.
>

GTG

all 3 package are yours.

I think the last version of the standard fonts are here
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=tree

Regards
Marco
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

Yaakov Selkowitz
In reply to this post by Ken Brown-6
On 2017-10-30 13:43, Ken Brown wrote:

> My cygport files and patch are attached.  The two fonts packages
> don't need updating, but their cygport files had to be updated, so I'm
> attaching them for future reference.
>
> In the case of ghostscript, the current version is 9.22, but it
> doesn't work with preview-latex:
>
>  https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698680
>
> So I propose to start with 9.21 until that issue is resolved.
Makes sense.

Didn't do a complete review, but noticed the following:

> --with-fontpath=/usr/share/${ORIG_PN}/fonts:/usr/share/fonts/TTF:/usr/share/fonts/Type1

The last two directories no longer exist[1]; just use /usr/share/fonts
(provided that subdirectories are automatically included).  It would
also be nice if the updated URW fonts[2] would also be installed under
e.g. /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35.  You may also want to poppler-data
instead of the bundled CMap's, as in Fedora[3].

[1] https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-09/msg00019.html
[2]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/urw-base35-fonts.git/tree/urw-base35-fonts.spec
[3]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ghostscript.git/tree/ghostscript.spec

--
Yaakov


signature.asc (235 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

Andrew Schulman
In reply to this post by marco atzeri-4
> On 30/10/2017 19:43, Ken Brown wrote:
> > My cygport files and patch are attached.  The two fonts packages
> > don't need updating, but their cygport files had to be updated, so I'm
> > attaching them for future reference.
> >
> > In the case of ghostscript, the current version is 9.22, but it
> > doesn't work with preview-latex:
> >
> >   https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698680
> >
> > So I propose to start with 9.21 until that issue is resolved.
> >
>
> GTG
>
> all 3 package are yours.

Gold stars awarded! https://cygwin.com/goldstars/#KB

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

Ken Brown-6
In reply to this post by Yaakov Selkowitz
On 10/30/2017 5:55 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> It would
> also be nice if the updated URW fonts[2] would also be installed under
> e.g. /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35.

Is the attached what you had in mind?  Following Fedora, I only packaged
*.t1 and *.afm files, even though the source package also contains *.otf
and *.ttf.

Ken

urw-base35-fonts.cygport (1K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

Ken Brown-6
On 10/31/2017 12:56 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 5:55 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> It would
>> also be nice if the updated URW fonts[2] would also be installed under
>> e.g. /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35.
>
> Is the attached what you had in mind?  Following Fedora, I only packaged
> *.t1 and *.afm files, even though the source package also contains *.otf
> and *.ttf.

Or did I misunderstand the second "also" in your mail above?  Wouldn't
it suffice to just install the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35 and
add this to the ghostscript search path?

Ken